Peer Evaluation / Feedback for EDC 102 Context Statement
Author: Matt G Editor: Mr. Fogleman Total Score for this Evaluation: 33/35 pts Nice job!- fogleman Oct 19, 2008
The purpose of the context statement in EDC 102 is to provide each student with an opportunity to demonstrate his or her ability to research a school, its district, and its community in order to better understand its strengths and challenges. Each report should describe their school based solely on evidence that they cite in their Reference section.
As a peer editor, your tasks are:
Read author's report.
Provide positive feedback to help your author be enthusiastic about writing.
Carefully evaluate report by assigning a score for each criterion
provide constructive comments that will help the strengthen the author's report for each category.
Create a link to your evaluation at the end of the report.
Rubric
Introduction = 5/ 5 pts.
5 - Intro provides an overview of the upcoming analysis, including what school/district/community is being analyzed, what aspects are being analyzed, and who the report is intended to inform.
4 - Intro names the school/district/community and previews the scope of the report, but does not describe who the report is intended to inform.
3 - Intro names the school/district/community but not much else.
2 - Intro fails to name the school, district, and community.
0 - No introduction section is apparent.
Constructive comments about report's introduction: See Comments in Report
Organization = 4 / 5 pts.
5 - Report includes an Introduction, a Conclusion, and sections for the School, District, and Community. Within each section, paragraphs logically group the information presented.
4 - Report includes all of the sections mentioned previously, but does not break down information into paragraphs within each section.
3 - Report is missing one of the sections.
2 - Report is missing more than one section.
0 - Report does not include any sections.
See Comments in Report. Organization fine. I deducted one point because tables came before explanatory paragraphs.
Mechanics = 5 / 5 pts.
5 - All information in the report is cited using APA styled- citations after the information and in a Reference section at the end of the report.
and
There are extremely few typos and misspelled words in the report.
4 - Most information is cited using APA style.
and/or
There are a noticeable number of typos or misspellings.
3 - Some citations in the References section are not in APA style, e.g. URLs are listed without the title of the website.
and/or
There are many typos, misspellings, or other writing errors.
2 - Most of the report's information is not cited, or APA style was not used.
0 - Report does not include a Reference section.
Conclusion = 4 / 5 pts.
5 - Conclusion reviews analysis of school, district and community and describes why findings should be important to reader.
4 - Conclusion reviews analysis of school, district and community.
3 - Conclusion does not refer back to report findings.
0 - No conclusion section is apparent.
Strengths and constructive comments about conclusion: Conclusion barely comes back to audience. Does not remind reader why main conclusions are interesting/important.
Creativity = 6 / 5 pts. / 5 pts.
5 - Report is written in an engaging style.
4 - Report has some interesting sections.
3 - Report generally reports information without seemingly without purpose.
Strengths and constructive comments about presentation: Layout of report is visually appealing, well-organized.
Thoroughness = 9 /10 pts
10 - Report includes at least ten different facts in each section (school, community, district) and
compares each figure/fact with another relevant figure/fact (e.g. state or national average) and
states whether or not the school is meeting NCLB standards.
concludes each session by summarizing its main points.
8 - Report includes at least eight different facts in each section and
compares most figures/facts with relevant values and
states whether or not the school is meeting NCLB standards.
6 - Report includes at least six different facts in each section and
compares some of the figures to other relevant figures
4 - Report includes at least four different facts in each section and
compares some of the figures to other relevant figures.
0 - Report includes less than four different facts for any section or
fails to compare any figures with other relevant figures.
Strengths and constructive comments about information contained in report: Summaries could be more complete.
Peer Evaluation / Feedback for EDC 102 Context Statement
Author: Matt G
Editor: Mr. Fogleman
Total Score for this Evaluation: 33/35 pts Nice job! -
The purpose of the context statement in EDC 102 is to provide each student with an opportunity to demonstrate his or her ability to research a school, its district, and its community in order to better understand its strengths and challenges. Each report should describe their school based solely on evidence that they cite in their Reference section.
As a peer editor, your tasks are:
Rubric
Introduction = 5/ 5 pts.
Organization = 4 / 5 pts.
Mechanics = 5 / 5 pts.
and
There are extremely few typos and misspelled words in the report.
and/or
There are a noticeable number of typos or misspellings.
and/or
There are many typos, misspellings, or other writing errors.
Conclusion = 4 / 5 pts.
Creativity = 6 / 5 pts. / 5 pts.
Thoroughness = 9 /10 pts
compares each figure/fact with another relevant figure/fact (e.g. state or national average) and
states whether or not the school is meeting NCLB standards.
concludes each session by summarizing its main points.
compares most figures/facts with relevant values and
states whether or not the school is meeting NCLB standards.
compares some of the figures to other relevant figures
compares some of the figures to other relevant figures.
fails to compare any figures with other relevant figures.
Strengths and constructive comments about information contained in report: Summaries could be more complete.